Reduce the Use of Animal Dissection in Zoology/Life-Sciences Courses

Started Thu, 2012-01-26 by IshaGupta
Addressed To: Animal Welfare Board of India
373
10000

Animal dissection as an aspect of Zoology curriculum is about 90 years old. However, shouldn't we debate whether there is an effective way of learning the ropes without actually dissecting real animals.

While some students may feel emotionally and support the idea, some may find it strange to study anatomy without dissection. Its only a matter of switching to other ways of studying the subject and getting used to it. If we think only from the human point of view, one living being has no authority to kill the other for ones selfish interst.

People who understand this are also aware of cruelity towards animals being prepared for dissection and its ill effects on humans. Animals are often embalmed with formaldehyde, a chemical preservative linked to cancer of the throat, lungs, and nasal passages. Formaldehyde can also damage the eyes, cause asthma attacks and bronchitis, and severely irritate the skin.

Net-net, its harmful for both, the humans and the animals. This act needs to be condemned! Sign and show your support!

To,

Animal Welfare Board of India,

I on behalf of many animal lovers, urge the authroity to either ban or reduce the use of Animal Dissection in Zoology and other Life Sciences Courses.

It is completely disheartening to see these creatures being tortured on the name of education. Science is the study of life and should therefore teach respect for life – a lesson that cannot be learned when living beings are treated as disposable objects and callously killed.

Instead, by using modern, humane teaching methods, instructors can teach both science and ethics simultaneously. They should work towards the implementation of non-animal teaching methods. In fact, the many non-animal teaching methods that are available are superior to the use of animals in science education. Non-animal techniques – including computer simulations, interactive CD-ROMs, films, charts and lifelike models – are generally more technologically advanced than animal-based lessons, and they teach life sciences more effectively.

Besides being cruel, dissection can have a devastating impact on the environment by decimating wild populations of insects and amphibians.

Therefore, I request the concerned organization and bodies to take this plea seriously and bring an end to the suffering for our fellow beings.

Thanking You,

Isha

lityo20
01 May 2013
Hungary
Fafnir06
30 Apr 2013
Germany
chwernli
30 Apr 2013
sylwiazieinska
25 Apr 2013
Poland
martina.costanzi1994
16 Apr 2013
Italy
dondy228
07 Apr 2013
shiyvah
05 Apr 2013
Portugal
Schranzprinzessin
04 Apr 2013
Germany
danijela-s
04 Apr 2013
Croatia
canant
04 Apr 2013
United States
jenbohn
04 Apr 2013
Canada
denizezgionur
04 Apr 2013
Turkey
Ellensharkey
04 Apr 2013
United States
riskhan
04 Apr 2013
Trinidad and Tobago
shiva.stephen
04 Apr 2013
Trinidad and Tobago
edytakasprzyk
04 Apr 2013
Poland
sarahblake77
04 Apr 2013
United Kingdom
athens
04 Apr 2013
Greece
sofieioannou24
04 Apr 2013
United Kingdom
strangelet2000
04 Apr 2013
Chile
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Isha.Gupta

Lets stand up for animals and condemn this act! report of instances where these speechless beings are being tortured for all to know :)

Yablaca

For starters, students in medicine need to speak up against animal testing and dissection if it is against their morals. If they are 'responsible' or 'qualified' to study medicine, then they are 'responsible' and 'qualified' enough to make this decision and speak against it if they wish.

There are enough alternatives to animal dissection (as is proved by thousands of articles over the internet) but companies and schools chose to overlook (for reasons unknown) since these alternatives are both more reliable and cheaper as well.

Teaching techniques are constantly evolving and should be re-evluated regularly; after all that is what progress is all about.

Here is a detailed link if you want to know more: http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/alternatives...

shonar

This could be checked out but I was told that the human placenta is the best alternative or perhaps even better than animals for experimentation as its cells are living and there is no death of placenta given the number of births on a daily basis. But of course i could be missing some vital details...

OR
Connect
Feel or have a thought for this, why not suggest an idea that might be of help towards the topic.
OR
Connect
No questions? I have, why don't you ask one?